Legal Opinion
Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 6, 2018No. 14-2410-cvUnpublished
1Opinion of the Court
14-2410-cv Munn v. Hotchkiss Sch. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Nikitas Amorgianos v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Bucalo v. Shelter Island Union Free School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Joan Gronowski v. John D. Spencer, Mayor of the City of Yonkers, Sued in His Individual Capacity, and City of Yonkers, Docket No. 04-2605-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.