Canfield v. Sandock
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
563 N.E.2d 1279 (1990)
David J. CANFIELD, Jr., Appellant (Defendant below),
v.
Melvin H. SANDOCK and Betty J. Sandock, Appellees (Plaintiffs below).
No. 71S03-9012-CV-780.
Supreme Court of Indiana.
December 13, 1990.
Rehearing Denied March 13, 1991.
Robert J. Palmer, Arthur A. May, Wendell W. Walsh, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, for appellant.
Robert F. Gonderman, Sr., Robert F. Gonderman, Jr., Gonderman Law Offices, P.C., South Bend, for appellees.
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
The trial court in this personal injury action instructed the jury to consider the effect of the injury on the "quality and…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Dickson; Concurrence · Dickson; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Pivarnik.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jordan v. BeroWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
- Flannery v. United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Canfield v. SandockIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Conder v. Hull Lift Truck, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Columbus v. StrassnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.