Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Smith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellee Smith, the proprietor of a used car business, filed suit on an insurance policy issued by Aetna seeking indemnification for the loss of a 1949 Hudson automobile. Aetna filed an answer disclaiming liability on the ground that the loss was not covered by the terms of the policy, and filed a third-party complaint against one Allen who, according to Smith, had stolen the vehicle, requesting judgment over against him in the event there was a finding of liability.
At trial it was undisputed that Allen had actually taken the vehicle from Smith’s lot. To avoid liability…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Gas Light Co. v. BiancanielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Hartman v. LubarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Flag Oil Corp. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
3Cited by6 opinions
- Battocchi v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. Rip C. Underwood, Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. H. K. Riddle and Dena RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Alaplex Transp., Inc. v. RossenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- GEORGE HYMAN CONST. CO., INC. v. DiNicolaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.