Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Smith

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1956No. 1862PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Appellee Smith, the proprietor of a used car business, filed suit on an insurance policy issued by Aetna seeking indemnification for the loss of a 1949 Hudson automobile. Aetna filed an answer disclaiming liability on the ground that the loss was not covered by the terms of the policy, and filed a third-party complaint against one Allen who, according to Smith, had stolen the vehicle, requesting judgment over against him in the event there was a finding of liability.

At trial it was undisputed that Allen had actually taken the vehicle from Smith’s lot. To avoid liability…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. BiancanielloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Hartman v. LubarDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Flag Oil Corp. v. TriplettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Battocchi v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. Rip C. Underwood, Tom Bolack and Wife, Alice Bolack v. H. K. Riddle and Dena RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  3. Alaplex Transp., Inc. v. RossenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  4. GEORGE HYMAN CONST. CO., INC. v. DiNicolaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw) v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API