Argento v. Beech & Bowne Building Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMurray T. Feiden, J.
The third-party defendant moves to examine plaintiff before trial. Plaintiff objects upon the ground that there is no issue raised between himself and the moving party.
Many cases which have permitted a third-party defendant to examine a plaintiff or a plaintiff to examine a third-party defendant have done so upon the theory that an issue had been created by the third party’s denial of plaintiff’s complaint (Anida Realty Corp. v. 6145 Realty Corp., 197 Misc. 157; Reizen v. Pardes, 197 Misc. 384; Vella v. Hinkle, N. Y. L. J., Sept. 19, 1957, p. 6, col. 3; Bizarro v. Zimkot, 283 App. Div. 816).
Li…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wischnie v. DorschNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Sorrentino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Rivkind v. FriedNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Anida Realty Corp. v. 6145 Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Foote v. Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rizzo v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Rudolph v. Bowling Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Lam v. Board of Education of Central Islip Union Free School District No. 13Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1965