Legal Opinion
Wischnie v. Dorsch
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 19, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNally, J.
This is a motion pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice by defendant Brookman Realty Corporation (hereinafter called Brookman) for summary judgment against the impleaded defendant Premier Linen Supply & Laundry Service, Inc. (hereinafter called Premier).
Brookman seeks to recover from Premier (a) $92,089.53 the total amount of two judgments together with interest and costs in favor of the plaintiffs in this action and in a companion suit entitled Steinkohl v. Dorsch; counsel have stipulated that the decision of this motion shall apply in the action of Steinkohl v. Borsch; (b)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Comstock v. . DrohanNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Wischnie v. DorschNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Municipal Service Real Estate Co. v. D. B. & M. Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Mirsky v. Seaich Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Murphy v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fernandez v. Cigna Property & Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Newitt v. NewittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Argento v. Beech & Bowne Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
- Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Empire City Iron Works, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- King v. Lenko Realty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1959