Anida Realty Corp. v. 6145 Realty Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAurelio, J.
Upon the foregoing papers this motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars is denied. It is within the contemplation of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act that a third-party defendant may oppose the claims of plaintiff against the defendant, third-party plaintiff. This third-party defendant has squarely put in issue the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint. It follows that it is entitled to a bill of particulars. The demand is modified to the extent consented to with reference to item 2, and by striking item 6 and limiting items 7 and 8 to those leases as to which it is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sorrentino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Argento v. Beech & Bowne Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962