Legal Opinion

Anida Realty Corp. v. 6145 Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAurelio, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this motion to vacate the demand for a bill of particulars is denied. It is within the contemplation of section 193-a of the Civil Practice Act that a third-party defendant may oppose the claims of plaintiff against the defendant, third-party plaintiff. This third-party defendant has squarely put in issue the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint. It follows that it is entitled to a bill of particulars. The demand is modified to the extent consented to with reference to item 2, and by striking item 6 and limiting items 7 and 8 to those leases as to which it is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sorrentino v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Argento v. Beech & Bowne Building Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API