Commonwealth v. Williams

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the Commonwealth failed to produce sufficient evidence to convict him of attempted murder,1 felonious restraint,2 kidnapping,3 aggravated assault,4 *438robbery,5 recklessly endangering another person,6 theft of movable property,7 possession of an instrument of crime,8 use of a prohibited offensive weapon,9 and criminal conspiracy.10 Appellant also contends that the lower court erred in admitting certain unfairly prejudicial physical evidence and in allowing a Commonwealth witness to testify that appellant elected to remain silent after his arrest. We believe…