State v. Napolitano
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: * “The writ in this case brings up for review the conviction of Napolitano on two counts of an indictment, one of which charges him with killing two heifers, the property of one Goldblatt, with intent to.steal the carcasses; and the other charging him with stealing the heifers.
Read the full summary
On appeal from the Supreme Court, in which the following per curiam was filed: * “The writ in this case brings up for review the conviction of Napolitano on two counts of an indictment, one of which charges him with killing two heifers, the property of one Goldblatt, with intent to.steal the carcasses; and the other charging him with stealing the heifers. Five grounds of reversal have been argued before us, three of which are directed at the charge of the court to the jury; the other two attacking rulings of the court upon the admission of evidence. “Taking up the criticisms upon the charge…
1Per curiam
The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The ChaNCEllor, Swayze, TRENOhaed, PARKER, BERGEN, KaTZENBACII, WHITE, IÍEPPENHEIMER, Williams, Tayloe, GaedNer, AoiceesoN, JJ. 12. For reversal — None.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- State v. Bentley Bootery, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
- State v. DeRoccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959