Legal Opinion

State v. DeRocco

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 5, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

53 N.J. Super. 316 (1959)

147 A.2d 280

THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

ANTHONY DeROCCO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 22, 1958.

Decided January 5, 1959.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.

Mr. Ralph S. Heuser argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Heuser, Heuser & DeMaio, attorneys).

Mr. William D. Danberry, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Warren W. Wilentz, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. DolbowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. State v. MorehousSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  3. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  4. State v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  5. State v. FriedmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. State v. CookNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  3. State v. ProvoidNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. State v. GleitsmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. State v. SanducciNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API