Legal Opinion

Sheinberg v. Sorensen

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 28, 2010No. 08-4148PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POLLAK, District Judge.

Eight years ago, this case, pending in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, was certified as a class action. Three years ago, the District Court decertified the class in an opinion stressing the inadequacies of then-class counsel. After plaintiffs-appellants obtained new counsel, they moved to recertify the class. The District Court denied that motion, and plaintiffs brought this *132interlocutory appeal. Because the District Court failed to apply the correct standards in ruling on the motion for recertification, we will…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. School District of Philadelphia Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Beck v. Maximus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  3. Roger O. Halverson v. Convenient Food Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. At & T Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Spoerle v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Dewey v. Volkswagen AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Joshua Howard v. William PollardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  4. In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. In re Certainteed Corp. Roofing Shingle Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API