Legal Opinion

Beck v. Maximus, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 4, 2006No. 05-3530PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCIRICA, Chief Judge.

In this consumer class action against a debt collector, the issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in certifying a class when defendant asserted a defense unique to the claims of the class representative. We will vacate and remand.

I

Maximus, Inc. has a contract with the U.S. Department of Education to collect overdue student loans. Between May 20, 2003, and May 20, 2004, Maximus sent a form collection letter entitled “Employment Verification Request” to the employers of 776 Pennsylvania individuals. The Employment Verification Request displayed “MAXIMUS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Neale v. Volvo Cars of North America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  5. In re Schering Plough Corp. Erisa LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API