Legal Opinion
Bee Mach. Co. v. Freeman
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 6, 1941No. 1224PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
In this action defendant has moved for a summary judgment under Rule 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c. The motion is based on the doctrine of res adjudicata, the defendant contending that all genuine issues of facts raised by the pleadings have already been adjudicated in a suit in equity, brought by this plaintiff, against this defendant and another, in the Federal Court in the Southern District of Ohio. The motion was submitted on the pleadings and affidavits which included copies of the records of the Ohio court.
No genuine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sandler v. SilkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Cambria v. JefferyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Olsen v. OlsenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Premier MacHine Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
- McNeal-Edwards Co. v. Frank L. Young Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Metlon Corporation, and Hayden C. Cobb, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Bee Machine Co. v. FreemanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943