State Ex Rel. Inland Properties Co. v. Court of Appeals of the Eighth Appellate District
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bx the Court.
Counsel filing the present petition in this court admitted in oral argument that motions had been filed in the Court of Appeals to expunge and obliterate the three entries appearing on the journal of that court, which motions were overruled, and that no appeals from such overruling were attempted. Such an admission by counsel is binding on a party.
Becapitulating, first, the petition alleges appeals were taken to this court to review the judgments which this proceeding in mandamus seeks to expunge and, second, no appeals were attempted from the overruling of the motions to expunge…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Dunphy v. GrahamOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Barner v. MarshOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
3Cited by10 opinions
- State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Nichols v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Dev. DisabilitiesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Sautter v. Grey, 06-Ca-6 (4-18-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.