Legal Opinion
Sautter v. Grey, 06-Ca-6 (4-18-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 2007No. 06-CA-6PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} This matter came before the Court on an original action for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition filed by Relators, Roland Sautter and Edward Sickmiller, against Respondents, Judge Lawrence Grey, the Morrow County Zoning Clerk, the Morrow County Zoning Inspector, and Intervening Respondents, CDD Acquisitions, Ltd., Washington Environmental, Ltd, and Harmony Environmental, Ltd. The matter is currently before the Court for consideration of Intervening Respondent's motion to dismiss for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and/or for summary…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Sautter v. GreyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. Smith, 06ap-1059 (6-12-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lakhi v. Healthcare Choices, 06ap-806 (8-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007