Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1942No. 28135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Court of Common Pleas of Belmont county had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject-matter. Appeal was not prosecuted from the judgment and it may not be collaterally attacked in the present mandamus proceeding. Gavalek v.Industrial Commission, 100 Ohio St. 399, 126 N.E. 317; 23 Ohio Jurisprudence, 1146, Section 1003.

Counsel for respondents contend they are not attempting to collaterally attack the judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction in a matter over which it had jurisdiction, but are directly attacking an entry purporting to be a judgment entered by a court which had no…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Inland Properties Co. v. Court of Appeals of the Eighth Appellate DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Welsh v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API