Legal Opinion
Chrimar Systems, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 29, 2014No. C 13-01300 JSWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
JEFFREY S. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Now before the Court is the motion by Plaintiff ChriMar Systems Inc. d/b/a/ CMS Technologies and ChriMar Holding Company, LLC (collectively, “ChriMar”) for judgment on the pleadings regarding the antitrust counterclaims filed by Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc. and Linksys LLC (together, “Cisco”) and by Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) (collectively, “Defendants”). Having considered the parties’ pleadings and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby grants Chri-Mar’s motion.
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Newcal Industries, Inc. v. IKON Office SolutionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- N. Am. Soccer League, LLC v. U.S. Soccer Fed'n, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Nokia Technologies Oy v. HP, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2024
- The Distance Learning Company v. The Maynard GroupDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- ThermoLife International LLC v. Neogenis Labs IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021