Hacker v. Rector
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. OLIVER, District Judge.
This case pends on defendant Goodrich’s motion to dismiss. That motion will be denied for the reasons we now state.
Plaintiffs, both “guest passengers” in a car owned and driven by defendant Rector, have sued both that defendant and defendant Goodrich as the manufacturer of an allegedly defective tire.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss is based on the theory that plaintiffs, as guests in the automobile owned and operated by defendant Rector, may not maintain their actions against defendant Goodrich because of lack of privity, or, stating its theory in different words,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Morrow v. Caloric Appliance CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Willey v. Fyrogas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Stevens v. Durbin-Durco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- McIntyre v. Kansas City Coca Cola Bottling Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clary v. Fifth Avenue Chrysler Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Sills v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1969
- Joseph Schenfeld v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Giberson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Nelson v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.