Hammer v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
Appellant filed an action in the superior court to void a special assessment on her property. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment and appellant contends that summary judgment was improper since there remained factual issues as to whether her property was in fact benefited by the construction which formed the basis of the assessment.
The record discloses that appellee initiated paving improvements, to-wit, the widening of Fort Lowell Road and other streets in the City of Tucson. Appellant owns land which fronts on Fort Lowell *230Road. She…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Hannon v. MaddenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. California-Arizona Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yencing Realty Co. v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Moore v. City of ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985