Legal Opinion

Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1985No. Civ. A. 75-3156PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, District Judge.

On December 21, 1984, this court entered a Consent Decree which settled the parties’ merit contentions in the above-captioned case. The plaintiff class, and named plaintiffs, have now petitioned for counsel fees and costs as the “prevailing party” in this litigation which has spanned more than ten years. Philadelphia Electric Company (“PECO”) agrees that plaintiffs are prevailing parties and are entitled to some fee award. However, it contests the extent of the claimed lodestar of $537,499, and some of the expert witness expenses included in the costs claimed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Vecchione v. WohlgemuthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Institutionalized Juveniles v. Secretary of Public WelfareDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Richerson v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. United States v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Fickinger v. C.I. Planning Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Black Grievance Committee v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Trappanese v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API