Legal Opinion

In Re Van Loo Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. Calendar No. 9, Docket No. 49,462PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

369 Mich. 102 (1963)

119 N.W.2d 666

In re VAN LOO ESTATE.

RENT

v.

FLETCHER.

Calendar No. 9, Docket No. 49,462.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided February 6, 1963.

Gottlieb & Silitch (George E. Silitch, of counsel), for plaintiffs Rent and Van Loo.

Leonard J. Paterson, for defendant Fletcher.

OTIS M. SMITH, J.

Appellants are daughter and son of the deceased, Livinius Van Loo. Appellee, Martha Fletcher, is his daughter. Having paid her father's funeral expenses, Mrs. Fletcher obtained an order, in 1958, under the probate code, CLS 1956, § 708.41 (Stat Ann 1959 Cum Supp § 27.3178 [451]), assigning his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fulton v. PreddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Loomis v. LoomisMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Jenkinson v. Monroe Bros. & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Takacs v. TakacsMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Tarnowski v. FiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. KeshishianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API