Legal Opinion

Heirs of Philbrick v. Spangler

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1860PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from the Second District Court of New Orleans, Morgan, J.

1Opinion of the CourtVooriiies, J.

The deceased, Samuel W. Philbrick, left a will, in the olographic form. The instrument reads as follows :

“ Should I die during this sickness, Mr. George- S. Kaus/er will send to my father, Samuel Philbrick, Skowhegan, Maine, one thousand dollars, the balance of my property to be given Isabel Spangler, 1 call her my wife."
“ Lafayette, December 2d, 1852."

(Signed) “ Samuel W. Philbrioic.”

The validity of this will is attacked by the legal heirs of the testator on the grounds, 1st, that it was written in pencil; 2dly, that the testator was not in his right mind when the will was written ; 3dly,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Holmes v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Rowland.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Cameron v. RowlandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  3. Succession of GainesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Maris v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. In re Meade's EstateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API