Legal Opinion

Fitzmaurice v. Fitzmaurice

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1932No. File No. 6014PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNuessle, J.

This is an action brought by a wife to recover damages from her husband for personal injuries alleged to have ■ been suffered by her because of his negligence.

The case was tried to a jury. At the close of the plaintiff’s case and again, at the close of the whole case, defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the evidence failed to establish negligence on the part of the defendant; that the plaintiff was herself guilty of contributory negligence; and that an action by a wife to recover damages for personal injuries resulting on account of the negligence of her husband does not…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Bandfield v. BandfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HassettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Brown v. GosserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953
  4. Nuelle Ex Rel. Reinhardt v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API