Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McIntosh v. Greensdale

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1886No. 12,507PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Washington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The complaint is founded upon a guardian’s bond executed by the appellee Greensdale as principal, and the other appellees as sureties.

The fourth paragraph of the answer contains these allegations : That Isaac C. Boyden was the guardian of the relator, McIntosh, prior to the appointment of Greensdale; that while Boyden was such guardian, he lent $172 of his ward’s money to Isaac Kochenour and received from him a promissory note therefor, with Thomas Vance as surety; that when Greensdale accepted the note the makers were the owners of a large amount of real and personal property and were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Norwood v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Marquess v. La BawIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Naltner v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Roush v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Shepard v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Line v. LawderIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API