State ex rel. McIntosh v. Greensdale
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Washington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The complaint is founded upon a guardian’s bond executed by the appellee Greensdale as principal, and the other appellees as sureties.
The fourth paragraph of the answer contains these allegations : That Isaac C. Boyden was the guardian of the relator, McIntosh, prior to the appointment of Greensdale; that while Boyden was such guardian, he lent $172 of his ward’s money to Isaac Kochenour and received from him a promissory note therefor, with Thomas Vance as surety; that when Greensdale accepted the note the makers were the owners of a large amount of real and personal property and were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Shaw v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bundy v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Norwood v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Marquess v. La BawIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Naltner v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Roush v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
- Shepard v. HansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Line v. LawderIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.