Legal Opinion

Line v. Lawder

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1890No. 13,952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, C. J.

This proceeding was instituted by Nettie S. Lawder and her husband to set aside the final settlement report of her former guardian, Benajah A. Line. It appears from the complaint that the ward was united in marriage, before she attained her majority, to Joseph Lawder, who was more than twenty-one years old. After her marriage the guardian obtained from his ward and her husband a release, and receipt in full for the amount which he informed them remained in his hands as guardian. It is averred, in substance, that he obtained the receipt by representing that he had in his possession available…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Higham v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Slauter v. FavoriteIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hardin's adm'r v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Garesché v. SlevinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. State ex rel. McIntosh v. GreensdaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. State ex rel. HeimannIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Coleman v. PeckhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Green, Admx. v. Green, Gdn.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API