Legal Opinion

McKenzie v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1998No. C8-97-1745PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

This case comes to us on appeal from the denial of appellant Mwati Pepi McKenzie’s petition for posteonviction relief and request for a hearing. McKenzie alleges that a group of Hennepin County judges met and decided to impanel anonymous juries in his and his codefendants’ trials, thereby violating his rights under the Due Process and Confrontation Clauses as well as a canon of judicial conduct. We hold that the posteon-viction court did not abuse its discretion in denying McKenzie’s petition and his request for a hearing.

A court may dismiss a petition for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bracy v. GramleySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hodgson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. State v. GrecingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  2. State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. DahlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. State v. KroschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  5. Rickert v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API