Grimsley v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Bonham.
The respondent was in the employ of the appellant railroad company which at the time of the occurrence which gave rise to this action, was engaged in interstate commerce.
The complaint sets forth that while the plaintiff, a machinist, was at work in the shops of the defendant at Florence, South Carolina, engaged in repairing an engine, the property of the defendant, and which was then being used in interstate commerce, through the negligence of the servant and employee of the defendant, who was assigned to assist the plaintiff at his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HollowaySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Youngblood v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
- Toole v. TooleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co. v. HawesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Long v. Carolina Baking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Williams v. Southeastern Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.