Legal Opinion
Roosevelt Brandon v. District of Columbia Board of Parole
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 8, 1984No. 83-1100PublishedCited by 98 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Roosevelt Brandon filed a pro se complaint seeking declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief against the District of Columbia Board of Parole (the Board) and its individual members for alleged violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Brandon claimed that the District of Columbia parole process is subject to the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment and that the Board’s delay in considering his case, its failure to supply adequate, reasons for its parole decisions respecting him, and its failure to reparole him in the same time period in which other similarly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richard G. Lawler v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt. Dunn, Captain McAlister Lieutenant Dunn, Officer Boehm, Officer Paul AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Dewey Baker v. Director, United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Donald Gene Henthorn v. Department of NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.