Whitsell v. Porter
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
The question is whether or not the purchase of a tract of land at a judicial sale should be held to be for the use and benefit of a number of heirs. The chancellor resolved the question in their favor under the law of joint adventure. The purchaser, Whitsell, appeals from the judgment.
The heirs of James Kirkwood, who died many years ago, had joint title to an undivided three-fifths interest in 31 acres of land, the other two-fifths belonging to strangers to the estate. It was to be sold and a division of the proceeds made under decree in a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Truitt v. Truitt's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Day v. AmburgeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Jones v. NickellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Central Trust Co. v. CreelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Griffin v. SchlenkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Abbott v. ChesleyKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Bradbury v. NagelhusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Kincaid v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
- Appleby v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Theodore Granik v. John H. Perry Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.