Legal Opinion

Saunders v. McDonough

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1928No. 6 Div. 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Under the previous decisions of this court, complainant has been adjudicated the equitable owner of one-fifth interest in the 9,970 shares of stock of the Self Fluxing Ore «fe Iron Company, issued to his coadventurers, and that he was entitled to an accounting from them for the highest value thereof, since the date of its conversion; it appearing that they had sold and disposed of the same. See the former opinions: Saunders v. McDonough, 191 Ala. 119, 67 So. 591; McDonough v. Saunders, 201 Ala. 321, 78 So. 160, 11 A. L. R. 419; Saunders v. McDonough, 210 Ala. 208, 97 So. 622.

The sale of said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Saunders v. McDonoughSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Shorter v. FrazerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  5. McDonough v. SaundersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Belcher v. Birmingham Trust National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1968
  2. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Van Heuvel v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Tucker v. Trussville Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API