Legal Opinion
Panama Commercial Co. v. Tingey
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1915No. Civ. No. 1643PublishedCited by 4 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. C. N. Andrews, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The facts in this case are identical with those in the case of Williams v. Tingey, ante, p. 574, [147 Pac. 584] (Civ. No. 1625), an opinion in which was this day filed affirming the judgment.
Plaintiff obtained judgment, from which defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company appeals.
The only point made herein by appellant, other than those presented in the other case, is that the action was to recover on the bond the value of the materials furnished and it appeared in the course of the trial that the materials were furnished pursuant to a contract made with one Rubendahl,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Williams v. TingeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
3Cited by4 opinions
- Prince v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Woodbury Granite Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- W. Harrison Price v. H. L. Coble Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- H. G. Fenton Material Co. v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932