Legal Opinion

Vallejo v. Randall

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco County. The opinion of the Court contains the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, J.

Murray, C. J., and Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.

The respondent commenced an action against the appellant in the District Court of the Twelfth District for the County of San Francisco, for the foreclosure of a mortgage on certain land situated in the County of Solano.

The appellant, Randall, filed his answer, in which he set out, amongst other matters, that the Court had no jurisdiction to try said cause,— the mortgaged premises described in the complaint being situated wholly within the County of Solano. To this portion of the answer of appellant, respondent demurred. The Court sustained the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Sunset Tel. and Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Simon v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Coakley v. AjuriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Brooks v. City of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Watts v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API