Legal Opinion

Scholte v. Brabec

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1929No. 27,114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Olsen, O.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

The action is one to recover damages for alleged malpractice or negligence on the part of the defendant, a licensed physician and surgeon, in setting and treating plaintiff’s injured left arm. Plaintiff recovered a verdict, and defendant’s motion for jiidgment notwithstanding the verdict or, if that be denied, then for a new trial, was denied.

The court, in one part of its charge to the jury, gave this instruction:

“If the defendant was negligent and plaintiff not contributorily negligent, then…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Viou v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Lorenz v. LercheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  3. Bonderson v. HovdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Gamradt v. DuboisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Storhaugen v. Motor Truck Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yates v. GambleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  3. Martin v. SchiskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Santee v. Haggart Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API