Legal Opinion

Neely v. Thomasson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 15, 2005No. 26024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

This case involves a probate matter. The probate court ruled that Nancy Thomasson (Nancy) was not the child of John Thomas Neely (Decedent) and therefore could not inherit from his estate. Nancy appealed and the circuit court affirmed. Nancy appealed once again, and the court of appeals held that (1) the probate court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to determine paternity, and (2) the divorce decree between Decedent and Josephine Morgan Wells (Mother) constituted a prior, final adjudication of paternity. Neely v. Thomasson, 355 S.C. 521, 586 S.E.2d 141…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Matter of HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Thompson, Adm'r v. HudgensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Palm v. General Painting Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Sojourner (In re Estate of Brown)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Phillips v. QuickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012
  3. Ex Parte Wheeler v. Estate of GreenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Thomas v. McGriff ex rel. Estate of McGriffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Byrd v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API