Legal Opinion

Wilson County v. Wooten

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 14, 1960No. 248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

It is conceded that Mamie L. Harrell and Maude H. Wooten established a joint savings account in the National Bank of Wilson pursuant to a contract duly executed by the parties, referred to hereinabove as plaintiff’s Exhibit B, and which reads as follows:

“We agree and declare that all funds now, or hereafter, deposited in this account are, and shall be our joint property and owned by us as joint tenants with right of survivorship, and not as tenants in common; and upon the death of either of us any balance in said account shall become the absolute property of the survivor. The entire account…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gwinn v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. In Re Kaspari's EstateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Musa v. Segelke & Kohlhaus Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Jones v. WaldroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Taylor v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. McAulliffe v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Matter of Estate of FrancisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Harden v. FIRST UNION NAT. BANK OF NCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API