Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Dumke

California Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1966No. S.F. 22072PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

In this mandamus proceeding plaintiffs seek to compel defendants 1 to restore them to the faculty of San Jose State College as of September 1, 1962, and to recover salary from that date. The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer without leave to amend as to both plaintiffs, and also granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Hutchinson. Judgments were entered accordingly, and plaintiffs appeal. As will appear, we have concluded that the rulings of the trial court were correct, and that the judgments appealed from should be affirmed.

In ruling on the sufficiency of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fort v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Watson v. Los Altos School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Griffin v. County of ColusaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Taliaferro v. CoakleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bogacki v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Endler v. SchutzbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Rosenfield v. MalcolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Bekiaris v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API