Legal Opinion
Taliaferro v. Coakley
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1960No. Civ. 18892PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant Coakley after order granting motion for summary judgment.
Questions Presented
1. Will summary judgment apply in a mandamus proceeding?
2. Will summary judgment lie when no answer is filed?
3. Effect of failure to file counteraffidavit.
4. Failure to file points and authorities on motion.
Record
Plaintiff as a taxpayer sued defendant Coakley, the Judge of the. Superior Court of Mariposa County (who presided pro tem. in the Superior Court of Contra Costa County in actions in which plaintiff was involved), the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Nini v. CulbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Loveland v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Gale v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by9 opinions
- Snider v. SniderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Larsen v. JohannesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Concerned Citizens of Palm Desert, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Stanton v. DumkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Sadlier v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.