Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided September 11, 1989PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

In this appeal following defendant’s conviction in Superior Court of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, defendant seeks a new trial, claiming reversible error in evidentiary rulings of the trial court and in the court’s admission of testimony prejudicial to defendant. The contested testimony consists principally of out-of-court hearsay statements of the nine-year-old victim and her five-year-old brother concerning the sexual assault, as well as the admission of third-party hearsay statements of prior sexual acts by defendant with the child. Defendant also asserts a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bush v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. Red Dog v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  4. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  5. Keyser v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API