Legal Opinion

Bellis v. Radabaugh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 25, 1928No. 18629PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, O.

Th’e parties appear as in the trial court. This action was commenced in the district court of Payne county by plaintiff to recover the sum of $350 on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendants to secure same. The petition is| in the usual form. The note was dated November 18, 1922, bearing eight per Cent, interest from date; and, among other provisions, has the following clause:

“Should suit be commenced for the collection of this note, a reasonable amount shall be allowed as collection, attorney’s fees to b'e taxed as costs whether it goes to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dodson Williams v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Eskridge v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Bryan v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Higgins v. ButlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Peters v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Howard v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Zusman v. First State Bank of LovellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Kahn v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API