Speed Boat Leasing, Inc. v. Elmer
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We are asked to determine what standard of care applies to the operator of a fifty-two-foot speedboat which offers pleasure or “thrill” rides in the Gulf of Mexico. The court of appeals held that it should be held to the high standard of care associated with common earners. 89 S.W.3d 633. We disagree. Our traditional common-carrier analysis turns on the business of transportation and whether the primary purpose of the operator in question is, in fact, the business of transporting people or goods. We conclude that the speed boat operator falls outside our definition of a common carrier. We…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mount Pleasant Independent School District v. Estate of Lindburg Ex Rel. LindburgTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- City of Amarillo v. TutorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Lamb v. B & B AMUSEMENTS CORP.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
- Markham v. Houston Direct Navigation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Jackson v. AxelradTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Morris, David, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
- Gomez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Nunez v. Professional Transit Management of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2012
- National Union Fire Insurance v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.