Legal Opinion

Hatch v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 2011No. 08-CF-1362PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Under the Anti-Sexual Abuse Act of 1994, the offense of first-degree sexual abuse is defined as the use of force to cause another person to engage in or submit to a sexual act.1 Until recently, another provision of the same Act made consent by the victim an affirmative defense, “which the defendant must establish by a preponderance of the evidence.”2 This did not mean the defendant was required to carry the burden of proving that he did not use force. As we explained in Russell v. United States, requiring the defendant to prove consent as a defense to a prosecution…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Conley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. KRISHNA PATRICK MUIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Legette v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Gee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Ewing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API