Ewing v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
Appellants David Ewing and Gloria Dunn were convicted after a jury trial of first-degree premeditated murder while armed, second-degree murder (as a lesser-included offense of felony murder), arson (two counts), and tampering with physical evidence.1 They primarily challenge their first-degree murder convictions. Dunn argues there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation, and claims the aiding-and-abetting instruction allowed the jury to convict her of first-degree murder without finding those elements present in her case. Ewing asserts the trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DEONTE J. BRYANT & TERRANCE M. BUSH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Bellamy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023