Legal Opinion

Ewing v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 2012No. Nos. 06-CF-951, 06-CF-1100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

Appellants David Ewing and Gloria Dunn were convicted after a jury trial of first-degree premeditated murder while armed, second-degree murder (as a lesser-included offense of felony murder), arson (two counts), and tampering with physical evidence.1 They primarily challenge their first-degree murder convictions. Dunn argues there was insufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation, and claims the aiding-and-abetting instruction allowed the jury to convict her of first-degree murder without finding those elements present in her case. Ewing asserts the trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Boyde v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DEONTE J. BRYANT & TERRANCE M. BUSH v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Bellamy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API