Legal Opinion

Gee v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2012No. 10-CF-1493PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant Rashaun Gee guilty of first-degree burglary while armed (knife), assault with intent to kill while armed, aggravated assault while armed, malicious disfigurement while armed, and attempted first-degree sexual abuse while armed, all in connection with an attack on victim Rachel Moretta. In this appeal, appellant contends that he is entitled to reversal of his convictions and a new trial because of “the trial court’s error in admitting improper expert testimony, in misapplying the Teomne-Lessane decision1 to the facts of this case, and for…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. General Electric Capital Corporation v. Lease Resolution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  4. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Chamontae A. Walker & Corey D. Yates v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. James A. Corbin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Hooker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Darius Young v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Clay (Bryan) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API