Legal Opinion

Friedt v. Moseanko

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1990No. Civ. 890385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

James Moseanko has appealed from a default judgment entered in the district court as a discovery sanction against him in Delores Friedt’s action to collect money due on a promissory note. We affirm.

On November 25, 1988, Friedt commenced an action against Moseanko to collect money asserted to be due on a promissory note. The district court ordered summary judgment in favor of Friedt. After judgment was entered, Moseanko filed a motion for reconsideration and to vacate the judgment. On April 17, 1989, the trial court ordered the summary judgment set aside.

After Moseanko…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vorachek v. Citizens State Bank of LankinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. St. Aubbin v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Thompson v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Timmerman Leasing, Inc. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API