Friedt v. Moseanko
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
James Moseanko has appealed from a default judgment entered in the district court as a discovery sanction against him in Delores Friedt’s action to collect money due on a promissory note. We affirm.
On November 25, 1988, Friedt commenced an action against Moseanko to collect money asserted to be due on a promissory note. The district court ordered summary judgment in favor of Friedt. After judgment was entered, Moseanko filed a motion for reconsideration and to vacate the judgment. On April 17, 1989, the trial court ordered the summary judgment set aside.
After Moseanko…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vorachek v. Citizens State Bank of LankinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Fargo v. BrakkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- St. Aubbin v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Thompson v. ZiebarthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Timmerman Leasing, Inc. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Lang v. Bank of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993