Legal Opinion

Friedt v. Moseanko

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1992No. Civ. 910294, 910254PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Deborah Moseanko and James Moseanko have separately appealed from the district court’s authorization of garnishment of the proceeds of their dairy operation’s milk production for application toward satisfaction of a judgment in favor of Delores Friedt. The proceeds are held by Schultz Creamery, subject to a security interest of Farmers Home Administration. The district court also denied the Moseankos’s motions to dismiss the garnishments, to reopen the case and dismiss the underlying default judgment, and for production of documents. We affirm.

Friedt sued James Moseanko…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Crosby v. BjorgenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Bismarck v. Compass Investments, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. First State Bank of Buxton v. ThykesonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Friedt v. MoseankoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hendrickson v. HendricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. LynneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Snyder v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API