Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Harris

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 8, 1926No. 11,304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Allen

This is an action for money had and received, and for damages for the detention of other moneys. To review a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings the cause here.

The amended complaint contains three causes of action. The first alleges, in substance, that plaintiff sold a tract of land in Eagle county to one Darien; that Darien deposited in a bank of which defendant was cashier the sum of $13,500 to apply on the purchase price, and that out of said money the defendant wrongfully converted to his own use the sum of $1,175. As to the second cause of action, the verdict was for defendant, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Tashima v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Zall Jewelry Co. v. StoddardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Grandbouche v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  4. Elstun v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API