Alexander v. Danek Medical, Inc.

ORDER

LAZZARA, District Judge.

Before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt.24), the supporting memorandum (Dkt.25), Plaintiffs Response submitted under seal (Dkt.S-2), and Defendant’s Reply (Dkt.32). After carefully reviewing the entire file, including the pleadings, any appendices, and all exhibits, the Court is inclined to grant summary judgment in favor of Defendant Danek Medical, Inc. 1

ProcedurallFactual History

In November 1996, Plaintiffs Edwin and Betty Alexander, husband and wife, filed this action for damages resulting from the surgical placement of the pedicle…