Legal Opinion

Brangi v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 15, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff presented his evidence and rested his case, and the defendants, offering no evidence, also rested, whereupon the court directed the jury to bring in a verdict for the defendants, on the ground that, upon the evidence, the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. The car of the plaintiff and the defendants’ truck were in collision at the intersection of Hamilton and Water Streets in New Haven. The jury could reasonably have found that the plaintiff was driving his car south on the west side of Hamilton Street and the defendants’ truck was being driven east on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neumann v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  2. Jackson v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Hall v. RootSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  4. Rohde v. NockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Woodhull v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bruneau v. QuickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Mathis v. BzdulaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  3. Fitzhugh v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Ferris v. Von MannagettaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Vecchiarelli v. WeissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API