Legal Opinion

Plattner v. Strick Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 16, 1984No. 83 C 0126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

This matter is presently before the Court on defendant’s motion for a new trial and relief from judgment under Rules 59 and 60(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s 60(b)(3) motion is denied. Defendant’s motion for a new trial under Rule 59 will be denied if plaintiff accepts remittitur in the amount of $73,895. In the event plaintiff refuses remittitur, defendant’s motion for a new trial will be granted limited to determination of “salvage value” of the trailers at issue.

*614I. FACTS

Plaintiff Richard T.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. Mary Beth G. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Grunenthal v. Long Island Rail RoadSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Toledo Scale Co. v. Computing Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Janeen O. Lonsdorf v. Ted Seefeldt, Jim Jenkins, Roger Johnson, Jerry Pionkowski, Jack Deyong, Group Health Cooperative, HmoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. In Re Muma Services Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Suburban Janitorial Services v. AmericanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Harduvel v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
  5. Gerald A. and Teresa L. Phillips v. Joshua D. StearWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API