Legal Opinion
Harduvel v. General Dynamics Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided August 15, 1992No. 84-1450-Civ-T-10PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAGLIARDI, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff moves for a new trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), based on newly discovered evidence, misconduct, and “fraud on the court.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(2), 60(b)(3), 60(b)(6). The motion is denied in all respects.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1
The plaintiffs product liability claim arises from her husband’s fatal accident at the controls of an F-16A fighter plane on November 15, 1982. In April, 1987, the case was tried to a jury, which awarded 3.1 million dollars in damages against General Dynamics Corporation (hereinafter “General…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- BUC International Corp. v. International Yacht Council Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Antolovich v. Brown Group Retail, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Martha Graham School & Dance Foundation, Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- R.C. Ex Rel. Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. NachmanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1997
- Timmons v. Rose Acceptance, Inc. (In re Timmons)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.