Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1994No. 1182-92PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MALONEY, Judge.

After a jury convicted appellant of the misdemeanor offense of reckless driving under Tex.Rev.Civ.StatAnn. art. 6701d, § 51(a), the trial judge imposed the maximum punishment of thirty days in the county jail and a $200 fine. Id. § 51(b). Upon *211direct appeal, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed. Bartholomew v. State, 834 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that speeding and racing were not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Jacob v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. State of Texas v. Meru, MarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  4. Irving v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API