Bartholomew v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
After a jury convicted appellant of the misdemeanor offense of reckless driving under Tex.Rev.Civ.StatAnn. art. 6701d, § 51(a), the trial judge imposed the maximum punishment of thirty days in the county jail and a $200 fine. Id. § 51(b). Upon *211direct appeal, the Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed. Bartholomew v. State, 834 S.W.2d 475 (Tex.App. — Houston [14th Dist.] 1992). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that speeding and racing were not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Livingston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Jacob v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- State of Texas v. Meru, MarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
- Irving v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.